Additive Scale: A New Method of Measurement in Psychological Research
Additive scales are a new method of measurement for psychological research that has recently been gaining attention. This type of scale is different from traditional scales, such as Likert scales, in that it is based on a simple additive principle. Through the use of this principle, researchers can measure psychological constructs in a more precise and accurate manner. This article will discuss the concept of additive scales, the advantages and disadvantages associated with them, and the potential applications for this type of scale.
Additive scales are based on the idea that psychological constructs can be measured in terms of the sum of their parts. Rather than using a single rating on a traditional Likert scale, the researcher instead assigns ratings to each individual item being measured. These ratings are then added together to determine the overall score for that construct. This type of scale offers a number of advantages over traditional Likert scales.
The first advantage is that additive scales are more precise than Likert scales. This is because the researcher is able to assign more precise ratings to individual items, which can result in more accurate overall scores. Additionally, additive scales can be more sensitive than Likert scales, meaning that they can detect small changes in a psychological construct that may not be detected using a traditional scale.
The second advantage of additive scales is that they are less susceptible to bias. Since each item is rated separately, the researcher is less likely to be influenced by the overall score of the scale. Additionally, since the scores for each item are added together to determine the overall score, the researcher is less likely to be influenced by any individual item.
The third advantage of additive scales is that they allow the researcher to measure multiple psychological constructs at once. This can be particularly useful when investigating the relationships between different psychological constructs.
Despite the advantages of additive scales, there are also some potential drawbacks. For example, since the ratings for each item must be summed together to compute the overall score, there is the potential for errors to occur. Additionally, since the ratings for each item are added together to compute the overall score, the researcher must be careful to ensure that the ratings are consistent across all items.
Despite these potential drawbacks, additive scales offer a number of potential applications in psychological research. They can be used to measure psychological constructs in a more precise and accurate manner, and can also be used to measure multiple psychological constructs at once. Additionally, they can be used to detect small changes in psychological constructs that may not be detected using traditional scales.
In conclusion, additive scales are a promising new method of measurement for psychological research. They offer a number of advantages over traditional Likert scales, such as greater precision, sensitivity, and less susceptibility to bias. Additionally, they can be used to measure multiple psychological constructs at once, and to detect small changes in psychological constructs. Given these advantages, it is likely that additive scales will become more widely used in psychological research in the future.
References
Aaronson, S. A., & Pincus, A. L. (1985). Accuracy of additive scales versus single-item scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), 286-289.
Finn, S. E., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Additive versus non-additive scaling of attitude items. Psychological Methods, 2(3), 273-287.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82.