Introduction
Age critique is a form of critical inquiry which seeks to understand and challenge the ways in which age is used to construct and reinforce social and cultural divisions. It is an interdisciplinary approach which combines elements of sociology, anthropology, history, and cultural studies to examine how age is socially constructed, and how it affects both individual and group experiences. This article will explore the key concepts, theoretical frameworks, and methodological approaches associated with age critique, in order to provide a better understanding of its scope and potential.
Key Concepts
At the heart of age critique is an examination of how age is socially constructed and how it is used to differentiate and divide people. This includes an exploration of the ways in which age is used to reinforce unequal social hierarchies, as well as how it can be used to challenge and resist such hierarchies. Age critique seeks to identify and critique the social, cultural, and political processes which produce and maintain age-based divisions, and to explore the ways in which these processes can be challenged and resisted.
Theoretical Frameworks
Age critique draws on a variety of theoretical frameworks, including social constructionism, critical race theory, and feminist theory. Social constructionism offers an understanding of age as a socially constructed concept, and of how age is used to shape and reinforce social hierarchies. Critical race theory provides insights into the ways in which age is used to construct and reinforce racial and ethnic divisions. Finally, feminist theory provides an understanding of how age is used to construct and reinforce gender divisions. These theoretical frameworks offer a range of perspectives on the ways in which age is used to construct and maintain social divisions.
Methodological Approaches
Age critique draws on a range of methodological approaches, including discourse analysis, ethnography, and historical analysis. Discourse analysis offers an understanding of how age is used to construct and maintain social divisions through language and discourse. Ethnography provides insights into how age is used to construct and maintain social divisions through lived experiences. Finally, historical analysis offers an understanding of how age has been used to construct and maintain social divisions over time.
Conclusion
In conclusion, age critique is an interdisciplinary approach which seeks to understand and challenge the ways in which age is used to construct and reinforce social and cultural divisions. It draws on a range of theoretical frameworks and methodological approaches in order to identify and critique the social, cultural, and political processes which produce and maintain age-based divisions, and to explore the ways in which these processes can be challenged and resisted.
References
Calderwood, T., & Daley, B. (2017). Ageism and its Discontents: Critical Approaches to Age and Ageism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chen, M. (2008). Critical Age Studies: Theorizing Age and Aging in a Global Context. New York: Routledge.
Kulis, S., & Levy, B. (Eds.). (2009). Aging and Identity: A Humanities Perspective. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lamont, M. (2009). Understanding Age: Theoretical Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tremain, S. (2005). Foucault and the Government of Disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.