LEADER-CATEGORIZATION THEORY

Leader-Categorization Theory (LCT) is a theoretical framework that explains how individuals categorize and evaluate leaders. This theory, developed by Yukl (1989, 1993), suggests that individuals refer to a set of criteria when evaluating a leader’s behavior and performance. These criteria include personal characteristics, interpersonal skills, and leader effectiveness. This theory has been widely used to explain leader effectiveness across different contexts and cultures.

The core of LCT is the notion that individuals use a set of criteria to evaluate a leader’s performance. These criteria include the leader’s personal characteristics, such as intelligence, trustworthiness, and charisma; interpersonal skills, such as communication and problem-solving abilities; and leader effectiveness, such as decision-making, task-oriented behavior, and managing resources. As individuals evaluate a leader, they assign a label to the leader based on how well the leader meets the criteria. This labeling process is called leader categorization.

LCT suggests that leader categorization is a dynamic process. This means that evaluation criteria and labels can change over time depending on the context. For example, a leader that is viewed as highly effective in one context may be viewed as ineffective in another. This is because different contexts may emphasize different criteria for leader evaluation.

The LCT framework has been widely used to explain leader effectiveness across different contexts and cultures. For example, it has been used to explain the leader-follower relationship in China (Yukl, 1989), the role of leaders in organizational change (Yukl, 1993), and the effects of gender on leader evaluations (Yukl & Van Fleet, 1992).

Overall, LCT is a useful theoretical framework for understanding the dynamics of leader categorization and evaluation. It provides a useful tool for studying leader effectiveness across contexts and cultures. Further research is needed to understand the long-term implications of this theory and its application in different contexts.

References

Yukl, G. (1989). Leader-follower relations in Chinese organizations. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 396-413.

Yukl, G. (1993). Leadership in organizations (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Yukl, G., & Van Fleet, D. D. (1992). Gender differences in leader behavior and effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 3(3), 181-193.

Scroll to Top