Majority Influence: A Review
The notion of majority influence has been studied extensively in the social sciences, from the psychological to the sociological. This review examines the literature on majority influence, including both its positive and negative outcomes. In particular, it explores the psychological processes underlying majority influence, as well as how it can be used in various contexts. Finally, implications for further research are discussed.
Majority influence occurs when the majority of individuals in a group or population exert their influence over the behavior of others. It has been suggested that majority influence is a significant factor in a wide range of social phenomena, including political decision-making, conformity, and social norms. This review will focus on the psychological processes underlying majority influence, as well as its applications in various contexts.
Firstly, the psychology of majority influence is explored. Research has shown that majority influence is associated with a range of cognitive processes, including the need to conform and the influence of social norms. In particular, social norms have been found to be an important factor in majority influence, as they can lead individuals to conform to the majority view. Moreover, majority influence can be further reinforced by the presence of a leader within the group, who can help to solidify the majority opinion.
In addition, majority influence has been studied in a variety of contexts. It has been suggested that majority influence can be used to influence behavior in both positive and negative ways. For example, majority influence can be used to encourage positive behaviors, such as voting or recycling. On the other hand, majority influence can also be used to encourage negative behaviors, such as peer pressure or bullying.
Finally, implications for further research are discussed. This review highlights the need for further research into the psychological processes underlying majority influence, as well as its implications for various contexts. In particular, there is a need for research that examines the impact of majority influence on individual behavior and decision-making, and its potential applications in different contexts.
In conclusion, this review has explored the literature on majority influence, including both its positive and negative outcomes. It has highlighted the psychological processes underlying majority influence, as well as its applications in various contexts. Finally, implications for further research have been discussed.
References
Crisp, R. J., & Turner, R. N. (2011). Social identity theory. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 574–585). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
Mackie, D. M., & Worth, L. T. (1989). Processing deficits and the mediation of positive and negative majority influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731–741.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension. New York, NY: Harper & Row.