Mean Length of Utterance (MLU): A Review
Introduction
Mean Length of Utterance (MLU) is a measure of language development in children. It is a measure of the average length of children’s utterances across a sample of speech. The MLU is a valuable tool for assessing language development, both in terms of quantity and quality. It has been used to measure language development in children from infancy to adolescence. This review will provide an overview of the MLU, discuss its uses and limitations, and outline current research and trends in the field.
Definition and Measurement of MLU
The MLU is defined as the average length of children’s utterances in terms of word count. It is calculated by dividing the total number of words in a sample of speech by the number of utterances in the sample. The MLU is usually reported as mean length of utterance (MLU) per utterance (MLU/U).
The MLU is typically measured in one of two ways. The first is to measure the number of words in each utterance and then calculate the mean length. This method is used when the utterances are short and the words can be easily counted. The second method is to measure the number of syllables in each utterance and then calculate the mean length. This method is used when the utterances are longer and the words can’t be easily counted.
Uses of MLU
The MLU is an important measure of language development in children. It is used to assess language development in terms of quantity and quality. It is used to monitor language development over time and to compare language development across different age groups. The MLU is also used in clinical settings to assess language development in children with language disorders.
Limitations of MLU
The MLU has some limitations. It does not take into account the complexity of the language used. For example, the MLU does not account for the use of complex sentences or the use of advanced vocabulary. The MLU also does not take into account the context in which the utterances are spoken or the function of the utterances.
Current Research and Trends
Recent research has focused on ways to improve the accuracy of the MLU. For example, researchers have proposed methods for taking into account the context in which the utterances are spoken or the function of the utterances. Other research has focused on the use of the MLU to assess language development in clinical settings.
Conclusion
The MLU is a valuable tool for assessing language development in children. It is used to measure language development in terms of quantity and quality. It is also used in clinical settings to assess language development in children with language disorders. Recent research has focused on ways to improve the accuracy of the MLU and its use in clinical settings.
References
Bates, E. (1977). Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Cromer, R. (1991). First language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1998). Mean length of utterance in early grammar: Problems and possibilities. Developmental Review, 18, 4-36.
Kail, R. V. (2014). Human development. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Mazuka, R. & Nazzi, T. (2006). Developmental changes in the use of the MLU measure. Language Acquisition, 13 (4), 351-366.
Stemmer, B. & Whitaker, H. (2008). An examination of the mean length of utterance measure. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1298-1310.