The Absolute-Judgment Method (AJM) is an experimental research approach used to evaluate an individual’s response to a stimulus. This method is based on the assumption that responses to a stimulus are affected by the context in which it is presented. AJM has been used extensively in psychology, education, marketing, and other domains to measure a variety of psychological and behavioral phenomena.
The absolute-judgment method involves presenting a stimulus to a participant and then asking them to assign a numerical rating to the stimulus on a scale from one to ten. This rating can represent the participant’s overall evaluation of the stimulus, as well as how they feel about it. For example, if a participant is presented with a picture of a car, they might rate it on a scale from one to ten, with higher numbers indicating higher levels of satisfaction.
The absolute-judgment method has been found to be an effective way to measure psychological and behavioral responses to stimuli. It has been used to measure preferences and attitudes, as well as to assess the effects of advertising and other marketing campaigns. Additionally, it has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of educational programs.
The absolute-judgment method has its advantages and disadvantages. One advantage is that it is very easy to administer and requires minimal preparation. Additionally, it is relatively inexpensive to conduct. However, there are some drawbacks to this method. For example, it is possible for participants to rate a stimulus in a biased manner, depending on the context in which it is presented. Additionally, the absolute-judgment method is not suitable for measuring subtle responses to stimuli, as it requires participants to assign a numerical rating.
In conclusion, the absolute-judgment method is an effective and relatively low-cost way to measure psychological and behavioral responses to stimuli. It can be used to measure preferences, attitudes, and the effectiveness of educational programs. However, it is important to be aware of its potential biases and limitations.
References
Brewer, B. W., & Campbell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and Intergroup Attitudes: East African Evidence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 20(3), 295-305.
Furnham, A. (1986). The Use of Rating Scales in Psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 77(4), 551-566.
Gardner, H. (1985). Social Psychology and Education. Educational Psychologist, 20(3-4), 207-229.
Kardes, F. R., & Herr, P. M. (1993). Advertising and Consumer Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(3), 225-245.
Krosnick, J. A., & Alwin, D. F. (1987). An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(1), 201-219.
Smith, P. B., & Zagefka, H. (2009). Attitudes. In The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 27-43). Sage Publications Ltd.