Ambiguous figures are those that can be perceived in more than one way. The ability to interpret ambiguous figures is an important part of human cognition. It has been studied in various contexts such as perception and mental imagery. In this article, we will review the literature on ambiguous figures and discuss some of the research findings.
Ambiguous figures are often used in cognitive research to study how humans interpret visual information. These figures are used to test the ability to perceive multiple interpretations of the same visual input and to measure cognitive flexibility. Ambiguous figures have also been used to measure creativity and the ability to generate alternative interpretations.
The most common type of ambiguous figures are the Necker Cube and the Rubin Vase. The Necker Cube is a two-dimensional figure that can be interpreted as a cube viewed from different angles. The Rubin Vase is a two-dimensional figure that can be interpreted as either a vase or faces depending on the way it is viewed. Other ambiguous figures include the reversible figures of the duck/rabbit, the young/old woman, and the goblet/mask.
Research has shown that humans tend to interpret ambiguous figures in a consistent manner. For example, people tend to interpret the Necker cube in the same way each time they view it. This suggests that the interpretation of ambiguous figures is based on cognitive processes such as the formation of mental images. It has been proposed that the ability to interpret ambiguous figures is related to the ability to imagine different perspectives and to think flexibly.
The interpretation of ambiguous figures has also been studied in relation to creativity. Studies have found that people who score higher on creativity tests are more likely to generate multiple interpretations of ambiguous figures. This suggests that the interpretation of ambiguous figures is related to creativity.
In summary, ambiguous figures have been widely studied in cognitive research. They have been used to measure cognitive flexibility, the ability to generate alternative interpretations, and creativity. Research has suggested that the interpretation of ambiguous figures is based on cognitive processes such as the formation of mental images and the ability to think flexibly.
References
Lam, M., & He, Z. (2011). Ambiguous figures and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 84-90.
Necker, L. A. (1832). Observations on some remarkable optical phaenomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phaenomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid. Philosophical Magazine, 7, 329–337.
Rubin, E. (1915). Figur und Gegenfigur: Eine psychologische Studie. Leipzig, Germany: Barth.
Searle, J. R. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.