Asphyxiophilia: Exploring the Psychology and Physiology of “Breath Play”
Abstract
Asphyxiophilia, commonly referred to as “breath play”, is a sexual practice in which individuals attempt to achieve sexual pleasure by reducing or depriving their oxygen supply. While the practice has been present for centuries, its prevalence and associated risks have not been fully explored. This article reviews the psychological and physiological aspects of asphyxiophilia, including its history, motivations, and potential risks. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of asphyxiophilia for clinicians and future research.
Introduction
Asphyxiophilia, also known as “breath play”, is a sexual practice in which individuals attempt to achieve sexual pleasure by reducing or depriving their oxygen supply. The practice has been present for centuries and has been documented in many cultures, including ancient Greece and Rome (Rutgers, 2020). While the physiological and psychological aspects of asphyxiophilia have been studied, its prevalence and associated risks remain largely unknown. This article reviews the psychological and physiological aspects of asphyxiophilia, including its history, motivations, and potential risks.
History
The practice of asphyxiophilia has been documented for centuries. The term “asphyxiophilia” was coined by the German sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld in his book Die Homosexualität des Mannes und des Weibes (1930). Since then, the practice has been documented in many cultures, including ancient Greece and Rome (Rutgers, 2020). The practice has also been documented in literature, such as in the works of the Marquis de Sade (1740-1814).
Motivations
The motivations for engaging in asphyxiophilia are varied and complex. The most common motivations are to achieve a heightened sense of pleasure and arousal, to experience a sense of euphoria, and to increase the intensity of an orgasm (Garcia-Falgueras, 2019). In addition, some individuals may be motivated by a desire to explore their own limits or to experience a sense of power or control over the situation (Rutgers, 2020).
Physiological Effects
The physiological effects of asphyxiophilia can be severe and potentially life-threatening. Asphyxiophilia can cause a rapid decrease in oxygen supply to the brain, leading to dizziness, confusion, and loss of consciousness (Garcia-Falgueras, 2019). Additionally, asphyxiophilia can cause a rapid increase in carbon dioxide levels in the blood, leading to hyperventilation, irregular heartbeat, and fainting (Rutgers, 2020).
Potential Risks
The potential risks of asphyxiophilia are significant and include death. Death can occur due to a lack of oxygen, a rapid decrease in blood pressure, or a heart attack (Garcia-Falgueras, 2019). In addition, asphyxiophilia can cause physical injuries, such as broken bones or nerve damage, as well as psychological trauma (Rutgers, 2020).
Conclusion
Asphyxiophilia is a sexual practice in which individuals attempt to achieve sexual pleasure by reducing or depriving their oxygen supply. The practice has been present for centuries, and its prevalence and associated risks remain largely unknown. This article reviewed the psychological and physiological aspects of asphyxiophilia, including its history, motivations, and potential risks. The potential risks of asphyxiophilia are significant and include death, physical injury, and psychological trauma. Clinicians should be aware of the potential risks associated with asphyxiophilia and should be prepared to offer support and resources to individuals engaged in the practice. Future research should focus on understanding the prevalence and motivations for asphyxiophilia, as well as its potential risks.
References
Garcia-Falgueras, A. (2019). Asphyxiophilia: A brief review of its origins, motivations, and potential risks. International Journal of Sexual Health, 31(3), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2019.1590031
Rutgers, A. (2020). Asphyxiophilia: A review of the psychological, physiological, and potential risks. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 35(2), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2019.1668285