Missing data is a common phenomenon in many research fields, and can have a major impact on the accuracy of results. In particular, consistent missing, or data that is missing in a consistent manner across a subset of observations, can be particularly difficult to handle and can significantly reduce the accuracy of results. This article provides an overview of consistent missing, its causes, and methods for dealing with it.
Missing data can arise due to a variety of reasons, including measurement errors, respondent errors, and missing variables. Consistent missing is defined as data that is consistently missing in a subset of observations, such as when a certain variable is missing in all observations from a particular group. This type of missingness can be particularly problematic as it can lead to bias in results, as well as decreased accuracy.
The causes of consistent missing can vary, but some common causes include incomplete surveys, incorrect survey design, and respondent fatigue. Incomplete surveys may lead to the omission of certain questions, resulting in consistent missing. Incorrect survey design may lead to respondents not answering certain questions or data not being recorded properly. Finally, respondent fatigue may lead to respondents not answering certain questions or recording inaccurate data.
There are a variety of methods for dealing with consistent missing data. The most common approach is to use imputation techniques, such as mean imputation, to fill in the missing values. However, this approach can introduce bias into the data, as the imputed values may not accurately reflect the true values. Additionally, other methods such as multiple imputation or complete-case analysis can also be used to address consistent missing.
In conclusion, consistent missing can be a challenging issue to deal with, and can lead to bias and decreased accuracy in results. However, there are a variety of methods for dealing with this issue, including imputation techniques, multiple imputation, and complete-case analysis.
References
Aguinis, H., & Cuervo, R. G. (2017). Missing data methods with applications. Sage.
He, X., & Jia, H. (2009). Imputation of missing data for large-scale surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 25(1), 19-38.
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (Vol. 2). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Pagoulatou, S., & Papadopoulou, S. (2018). Missing data in survey research: An overview. International Statistical Review, 86(1), 75-98.