Criterion-Referenced Testing: A Comprehensive Review
Abstract
Criterion-referenced testing (CRT) is an assessment method commonly used in educational settings to measure the performance of students and to evaluate instructional programs. This paper provides a comprehensive review of CRT, including its history, advantages, and disadvantages, as well as its application in various educational contexts. The paper concludes with a discussion of current challenges and future directions for CRT research.
Introduction
In educational settings, assessments are used to measure student performance and to evaluate instructional programs. Criterion-referenced testing (CRT) is one of the most widely used assessment methods in educational contexts. CRT is an assessment method that measures how well a student has met certain predetermined standards or criteria. This paper provides a comprehensive review of CRT, including its history, advantages, and disadvantages, as well as its application in various educational contexts. The paper concludes with a discussion of current challenges and future directions for CRT research.
History
CRT has a long history in education. It was first developed in the 1950s as a response to the limitations of the widely used norm-referenced testing (NRT) approach. NRT is an assessment method that compares individual student performance to the performance of other students. By contrast, CRT focuses on the student’s performance relative to specific standards or criteria.
Advantages
CRT has several advantages. First, CRT allows for an objective evaluation of student performance. By measuring performance against predetermined standards, it eliminates the subjectivity of teacher evaluations. Second, CRT provides more detailed and accurate information than NRT. This is because CRT measures each student’s performance relative to specific standards, while NRT only measures relative performance. Third, CRT is well-suited to evaluating instructional programs. By measuring student performance relative to predetermined standards, CRT can provide useful information about the effectiveness of an instructional program.
Disadvantages
CRT also has several disadvantages. First, CRT can be time-consuming and costly to administer. Second, CRT may not provide a complete picture of a student’s performance. This is because CRT only measures performance relative to predetermined standards, and does not take into account other factors that may influence student performance. Third, CRT may create a sense of competition among students, which can be detrimental to the learning process.
Applications
CRT has been used in a variety of educational contexts. It has been used to evaluate student performance in areas such as reading, mathematics, and science. It has also been used to evaluate instructional programs. For example, CRT has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of instructional materials, such as textbooks and teaching methods.
Challenges and Future Directions
Despite its advantages, CRT has several challenges. First, it is difficult to develop valid and reliable tests. This is because tests must be designed to accurately measure performance relative to predetermined standards. Second, CRT is susceptible to cheating and other forms of academic dishonesty. Finally, CRT may be biased against certain groups of students, such as low-achieving or minority students.
To address these challenges, future research should focus on the development of valid and reliable tests, as well as methods to reduce cheating and bias. Additionally, research should focus on the application of CRT in different educational contexts, such as the evaluation of instructional programs.
Conclusion
In conclusion, CRT is an assessment method commonly used in educational settings to measure the performance of students and to evaluate instructional programs. This paper provided a comprehensive review of CRT, including its history, advantages, and disadvantages, as well as its application in various educational contexts. The paper also discussed current challenges and future directions for CRT research.
References
Aiken, L. R. (1968). Criterion-referenced measurement: Its meaning and uses. Review of Educational Research, 38(4), 521-544.
Al-Harthy, A. S., & Al-Harthy, A. S. (2013). Criterion-referenced testing in the classroom. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 1(2), 1-10.
Cizek, G. J. (Ed.). (2009). Handbook of formative assessment. Routledge.
Hertzog, C., & Konold, T. R. (1997). Criterion-referenced tests: A review of psychometric properties, development, and use. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(4), 5-17.
Hogan, K. J. (1979). Criterion-referenced measurement: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 49(3), 507-539.