Intransitivity is a concept in linguistics that refers to a type of verb construction which does not allow certain objects to be used in a sentence. Intransitivity is also referred to as “unaccusativity” in some contexts and can be contrasted with transitive verbs, which do allow objects to be used. Intransitive verbs are considered to be a closed class of verbs and are found in a wide variety of languages.
In terms of syntax, intransitive verbs are usually marked by the presence of a subject, but lack an object. Intransitive verbs are said to describe an event or action that only involves the subject. For example, the English verb “run” is intransitive as it cannot take an object, i.e. “*I run the ball”. In contrast, the English verb “read” is transitive as it can take an object, i.e. “I read the book”.
Intransitive verbs can be further divided into three types: stative, dynamic, and linking. Stative verbs are verbs which describe a state of being, such as “to be” or “to have”. Dynamic verbs are verbs which describe a process or action, such as “to run” or “to jump”. Linking verbs are verbs which connect the subject of the sentence to a noun or adjective, such as “to seem” or “to appear”.
Intransitive verbs have been found to be important in the study of language acquisition, particularly in the early stages. For example, the acquisition of intransitive verbs has been found to be more difficult for children than the acquisition of transitive verbs, due to the lack of an object in intransitive sentences. This difficulty is thought to be due to the greater complexity of the syntactic structures associated with intransitive verbs.
In conclusion, intransitivity is a concept in linguistics which refers to a type of verb construction which does not allow certain objects to be used. Intransitive verbs can be divided into three types—stative, dynamic, and linking—and have been found to be important in the study of language acquisition.
References
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition (Vol. 1, pp. 224–311). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (1996). The origins of grammar: Evidence from early language comprehension. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kuno, S. (1973). The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.