Introduction
Masculinity-Femininity Tests are a type of psychological assessment that looks at the gender roles of people and measures how they conform to traditional gender expectations. The tests are used to measure a person’s tendency towards either masculine or feminine traits, behaviours, and roles. This article will discuss the definition, history, and characteristics of Masculinity-Femininity Tests.
Definition
Masculinity-Femininity Tests are psychological assessments that measure a person’s conformance to traditional gender roles. The tests measure a person’s tendency towards either masculine or feminine traits, behaviours, and roles. The tests are used to determine whether a person is more likely to conform to traditional gender roles or to have a more gender equal approach to activities, behaviours, and expectations.
History
Masculinity-Femininity Tests have a long history, with the first tests being developed in the early 1900s. The tests were developed to measure a person’s conformance to traditional gender roles, as well as to measure a person’s psychological and emotional traits. The tests were first used to diagnose gender identity disorders, and were later used to measure how people conformed to traditional gender roles.
Characteristics
Masculinity-Femininity Tests are typically administered in the form of a questionnaire. The questions on the questionnaire measure a person’s tendencies towards either masculine or feminine traits and behaviours. The questions may ask about a person’s preferences in activities, dress, hobbies, and other gender-related topics. The tests also measure a person’s attitudes towards gender roles and expectations.
Conclusion
Masculinity-Femininity Tests are psychological assessments that measure a person’s conformance to traditional gender roles. The tests have a long history, with the first tests being developed in the early 1900s. The tests are typically administered in the form of a questionnaire and measure a person’s tendencies towards either masculine or feminine traits and behaviours.
References
Archer, J. (2002). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 6(4), 291–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.291
Lippa, R. A. (2005). Gender, nature, and nurture (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Petersen, A. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017504