Yes-No Judgment Task: An Overview
The Yes-No Judgment Task (YNJT) is a widely used paradigm in cognitive psychology and neuroscience research. It is a simple task that involves making judgments about a given stimulus. This task can be used to study a variety of cognitive processes, including decision making and response inhibition. In this article, we provide a brief overview of YNJT, its underlying cognitive processes, and its applications in research.
The YNJT is a two-choice task that requires participants to make a binary decision, either responding “yes” or “no” to a given stimulus. The stimulus can be either a visual or auditory cue, and it typically consists of a single word or picture that has been pre-selected by the researcher. Participants are instructed to respond as quickly and accurately as possible. YNJT has been used in numerous studies to investigate the cognitive processes involved in decision making and response inhibition.
The cognitive processes underlying YNJT can be divided into two main categories: perceptual processing and response selection. During the perceptual processing stage, participants must quickly process the stimulus and form a mental representation of it. This mental representation is then used to guide the decision-making process during response selection. During this stage, participants must select the appropriate response based on the stimulus and their prior knowledge.
YNJT has been used in a variety of research contexts, such as studies of attention, memory, decision making, and response inhibition. For example, YNJT has been used to study the effects of aging on decision-making processes, and to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying response inhibition in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).
Overall, the YNJT is an important and widely used cognitive paradigm. It has been used to study a variety of cognitive processes, including decision making and response inhibition. Additionally, it has been applied to a wide range of research contexts, including the study of aging and ADHD.
References
Bunge, S.A., Wendelken, C., & Badre, D. (2005). Neuroanatomical distinctions between rule-based and information-integration category learning. Cerebral Cortex, 15(4), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh186
Chamberlain, S.R., Blackwell, A.D., Fineberg, N.A., Robbins, T.W., & Sahakian, B.J. (2006). The neuropsychology of decision-making and response inhibition: Are they related? Neuropsychologia, 44(2), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.005
Dawson, M.E., LaGasse, L.L., Nigg, J.T., Hinshaw, S.P., & Sonuga-Barke, E.J. (2005). Neuropsychological correlates of early maltreatment in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 57(6), 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.12.037
Miller, E.K., & Cohen, J.D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 167–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167